Please select your state
so that we can show you the most relevant content.
As the House takes up appropriations under the shadows of inflation and last year’s reconciliation, the cracks in federal budgeting continue to grow. Floor consideration of appropriations bills won’t be followed with individual conference committees and enactment, but with a short-term continuing resolution and perhaps a bloated omnibus appropriations bill after the election.
Appropriations are a vital part of Congress’ legislative powers and support core federal responsibilities. They increasingly provide program guidance due to uneven authorizations. To their credit, the Committees on Appropriations work through this legislation every year.
Even so, this approach makes less sense over time. The twelve appropriations bills range from $7.1 billion for the legislative branch to $762 billion for defense (not including military construction or nuclear accounts). Considering appropriations bills separately erects barriers to amendments touching multiple bills.
These stovepipes go well beyond appropriations. Appropriations include just 30% of federal spending and exclude revenue entirely. Unsustainable growth in direct spending programs darkens our fiscal future. Yet today’s annual process puts these programs out of sight, out of mind, and out of reach.
Direct spending and revenue programs often overlap with appropriated programs. A Senate Budget Committee report in 2020 noted that 20 federal entities manage 160 federal housing programs scattered across the tax code, direct spending programs, and appropriated programs.
Disjointed budgeting yields dysfunction. Widespread dissatisfaction with the current system can lead to impasse, threaten a government shutdown, and undermine Congress’ functioning. A tightly controlled amendment process, ad-hoc continuing resolutions, and bloated, lame-duck omnibus spending bills have become normal.
Budget reconciliation has become a weapon of short-lived unified government. It makes the budget outlook worse instead of reconciling programs with an increasingly less frequent budget resolution.
A real budget with all spending and all revenue is an important way for Congress to move from polarizing dysfunction toward productive deliberation. The Appropriations Committees can and should continue to lead the budget cycle through both discretionary allocations and in managing the floor.
To build a complete budget around appropriations, each authorizing committee would send its spending line-items and legislative proposals — plus revenue for Ways and Means and Finance — to the Appropriations Committees, which would bundle them without substantive changes into one bill starting with titles from the twelve appropriations subcommittees. Then, on the floor, members could build coalitions and propose amendments across the entire federal budget.
Reasonable budget targets should supplement holistic budgeting. Next-generation fiscal rules use structural balance (balance over the business cycle) to improve budget management and policy stability instead of destabilizing annual balance. Today’s large imbalances recommend a glide path to primary structural balance — which excludes net interest costs — as an interim, achievable target. These rules can be constitutional amendments and/or statutory.
Finally, the possibility of shutdowns — which Congress never intended — means that new budget legislation merely has to be better than a shutdown. This low bar and leaders’ risk aversion results in bloat and program disorder in tightly controlled packages with little time for members to review and no chance to amend.
Maintaining the status quo with an automatic continuing resolution until Congress changes course requires that majorities prefer the new legislation to existing policy. Auto CRs would make budgeting more inclusive, productive, and timely as each new budget improves on what came before.