Recent News
The Loper Bright decision not only impacts existing regulations but has implications for interpreting newly passed legislation. The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, a sweeping, bipartisan housing bill, was enacted on July 11, 2026, and any legal challenges regarding unclear or ambiguous language will receive judicial, not agency, deference.
Americans for Prosperity recently published a report explaining why each summer Congress should legislatively respond to Supreme Court decisions interpreting federal statutes.
These reforms will go a long way towards restoring affordability and opportunity to North Carolinians.
Congress should amend IEEPA to restrain emergency tariff powers after the Supreme Court’s decision in Learning Resources v. Trump.
Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo began with Atlantic fishermen asking what gave Washington the right to make them pay for government monitors. Congress had never explicitly authorized industry-funded monitors for their fishery. The fishermen took their case to court and won, overturning the 1984 Chevron deference doctrine and ending the practice of courts deferring to agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous laws. The Loper Bright ruling opened the legal door for a broader deregulatory push that is […]
Since the Loper Bright decision ended Chevron deference, lawmakers and regulators have made strong strides in cutting out costly and burdensome regulations responsible for hampering the energy industry.
The FDA’s decades-old requirement that drugs prove “efficacy” before approval has slowed access to promising treatments, raised costs, and left patients waiting. A “Safe to Try” approach would keep regulators focused on safety while allowing doctors and patients to decide what works.
On Monday, Americans for Prosperity Foundation and the Buckeye Institute, joined an amicus brief the New Civil Liberties Alliance filed in the U.S. Supreme Court in Department of Labor (“DOL”) v. Sun Valley Orchards, a constitutional challenge to an inhouse administrative tribunal in which the DOL wears multiple hats, acting as both the prosecutor and judge of its own cause to impose severe monetary penalties on private parties.
DSA housing policies would erode private property rights, greatly expand government intervention, and actually reduce the housing supply.
