Please select your state
so that we can show you the most relevant content.
Why was this bill introduction so important? What problem are these members of Congress attempting to solve?
Federal laws regulating cannabis were adopted more than 50 years ago. They still reflect the outdated perspective that this plant “has no currently accepted medical treatment use” and is extremely dangerous to consume.
This perspective has resulted in our federal and state governments spending trillions in taxpayer money to catch and punish millions of Americans for the use and sale of cannabis.
The number of annual arrests related to cannabis skyrocketed by more than 320 percent between 1970 and its peak in 2009.
In total, law enforcement agencies have arrested more than 17 million Americans for cannabis offenses since 1985.
These law enforcement activities have disproportionately affected communities of color even though rates of drug use are similar across all communities.
What have been the outcomes of this investment of trillions in taxpayer money?
After decades of trying the same tactics without different results, some state leaders began to question whether their states were taking the right approach to cannabis policy.
The volume of these questions was elevated by a growing body of research revealing that marijuana can be an effective treatment for certain medical conditions and an admission from experts that it lacks some of the dangers associated with other drugs, such as fatal overdoses.
Most states have now at least implicitly recognized the failures of prohibition and the potential promise of marijuana as an innovative medical treatment by allowing their citizens access to certain products. They have attempted to do so in ways that better control product quality and access among children.
The federal government seems to have reached the same conclusion in practice even if cannabis continues to be located on Schedule 1 of the Controlled Substances Act.
Congress has adopted an amendment each year since 2014 that prohibits the Department of Justice from using taxpayer money in ways that would prevent states from implementing medical marijuana programs.
The past two presidential administrations have also chosen not to enforce federal laws in states that have adopted reforms. This can be seen in the consistent year-over-year decline in the number of federal criminal cases involving marijuana in the past decade – now 20 percent of what they were in 2011.
The status quo leaves patients, doctors, entrepreneurs, and law enforcement with significant uncertainty.
The principles of federalism mean that someone can be following every single regulation and guideline under state law but still be taking a chance they could be prosecuted and incarcerated under federal law.
This situation undermines both the credibility of federal law and the rule of law itself. It is difficult for citizens to respect our laws if they are not consistently enforced.
Inconsistent and arbitrary enforcement of a failed law is not a permanent solution.
As Justice Thomas recently stated the federal government’s “half-in, half-out regime…strains basic principles of federalism.”
The States Reform Act will finally end this confusing circumstance and restore the proper balance of power between states and the federal government.
As I recently discussed, the States Reform Act would:
Americans for Prosperity exists to elevate the voices of grassroots activists who seek to tackle our country’s biggest challenges.
“It is time for members of Congress to catch up with their constituents who support the end of marijuana prohibition.”
Our team seeks to empower every one of these Americans to have their voices heard on this important issue and tell Congress to support the State Reform Act.
Want to join us? Get involved today.
Finally, these additional resources will deepen your understanding of the States Reform Act: