Please select your state
so that we can show you the most relevant content.


ICYMI: Break the Partisan Gridlock on Judicial Nominations

May 29, 2018 by AFP

AFP Vice President of Judicial Strategy Sarah Field | The Hill

A proposal by Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma to limit debate time for judicial nominees would help resolve a vacancy crisis that threatens the ability of federal courts to provide justice in a timely fashion.

The change, approved by the Senate Rules Committee last month, would break the gridlock on judicial nominations. President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have worked quickly to nominate and confirm fair, qualified individuals to the federal judiciary, but 147 vacancies remain. Their efforts to fill those seats have been stymied by unprecedented obstructionism.

The nominees selected by President Trump are hardly controversial. Far from being political ideologues, they are experienced lawyers and judges who can be trusted to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law.

Another delaying tactic used by senators to slow the process is to force the majority to move to invoke “cloture,” which limits debate to 30 hours, and then to insist on using the full 30 hours of debate time for even noncontroversial candidates.

Senators have used this tactic on 89 of President Trump’s nominees during his first 16 months in office. By contrast, there were just 32 cloture votes during the first terms of the last four presidents combined – a period of 16 years.

Thirty hours of debate time may be warranted for particularly contentious or important nominations – say, the appointment of a justice to the Supreme Court. But for the typical judicial nominee, it is simply a waste of the Senate’s time.

Enter Sen. Lankford, whose reform would reduce debate time for most executive branch nominees to eight hours and for district court nominees to two hours. Supreme Court, Circuit Court and Cabinet-level nominees would still receive 30 hours of debate time.

Instituting Lankford’s reform would also ensure that Republicans wouldn’t be able to use the same tactic in the future to obstruct appointments by a Democratic president and Senate.

Lawmakers should not hesitate to enact the change. They might not have time to spare. Should the GOP lose control of the Senate in November, the resulting gridlock would likely slow the confirmation process to a halt.

For further information or to set up an interview, please send an email to

Americans for Prosperity (AFP) exists to recruit, educate, and mobilize citizens in support of the policies and goals of a free society at the local, state, and federal level, helping every American live their dream – especially the least fortunate. AFP has more than 3.2 million activists across the nation, a local infrastructure that includes 36 state chapters, and has received financial support from more than 100,000 Americans in all 50 states. For more information, visit