Please select your state
so that we can show you the most relevant content.

Americans for Prosperity- Virginia: Janus v. AFSCME Decision a Win for Worker Freedom

Jun 27, 2018 by AFP

RICHMOND, VA – The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of Mark Janus today in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). The court held that no public employee can be compelled to pay any union dues or fees as a condition of employment.

“This ruling upholds a fundamental constitutional principle. No one should be forced to fund political activity they disagree with simply to keep their job,” said Americans for Prosperity- Virginia State Director JC Hernandez “AFP-Virginia brought over 50 activists to the Supreme Court the day this case was heard. This was a particularly gratifying decision for them. We will continue to advocate for policies that protect freedom of speech and association.”

AFP-VA activists at the United States Supreme Court

AFP-VA activists at the United State Supreme Court 

At issue in this case was the power of labor unions to collect “fair share” or “agency fees” from public employees who have opted out of the union in their workplace. Mark Janus – a public employee in Illinois – challenged the constitutionality of the law compelling him to pay these union fees, arguing it violates his right to free speech because collective bargaining with the government affects public policy issues and thus is inherently political in nature. Thus, these mandatory dues to fund collective bargaining constitute forced political speech.

Read More:
Americans for Prosperity: How Janus v. AFSCME Could Expand Worker Freedom


Prior to the ruling, in the 22 states that don’t have a right-to-work law – including Mark Janus’ home state of Illinois – public employees who opted out of union membership were still forced to fund union collective bargaining through so-called agency fees. Not only are agency fees used for collective bargaining that affects public policy, they are also spent on activity that is overtly political in nature, such as donations to politically motivated nonprofit organizations or funding events with a political message.

In 2015, AFSCME itself estimated that about half of its membership would consider no longer paying dues if they were given the freedom to make that choice. Earlier this year, Politico reported on the National Science Foundation’s General Social Survey findings that 23 percent of unionized government employees don’t believe workers need strong unions.