{{ AFP National Site
s

The Surprising Face of the Minimum Wage Earner

July 03, 2013 J

By Steven Russell

Poll after poll  shows that most Americans agree: the current federal minimum wage is not enough  to live on. It’s hard to imagine a single parent trying to raise a child on just  $15,000 a year. However, a closer look at the type of person that earns a  minimum wage surprisingly suggests that almost no one depends solely on those  earnings to survive. Instead, the largest group minimum wage recipients is  comprised mainly of teenagers and spouses working to gain experience or  supplement the main source of their family’s income. As such, decisions to  increase the minimum wage do little to benefit the groups they are meant to help  while hurting everyone else in the process.

According to the Bureau of  Labor Statistics, there are about 1.6 million Americans earning minimum  wage.  Of those Americans, 40% percent—over 600,000 people—are teenagers or  other dependents living with family members. Another 56% are adults living with  a spouse who also works. Therefore, over 96% of minimum wage earners do not  solely depend on that income to live. A study by the Employment  Policy Institute found that for eight in ten families with children in which  one parent was making the minimum wage, the parent’s earnings accounted for less  than 20% of the household’s total income. Based on these statistics, the vast  majority of minimum wage workers are young entry-level employees hoping to gain  experience or parents earning extra income for their families. The discussion  about whether the minimum wage is a “livable” one largely ignores the conditions  under which most people earn it.

The evidence that so few Americans depend on the minimum wage to survive may  seem puzzling at first, especially since there are 16  million households living on less than $15,000 a year. Of those households,  however, only 36% have someone that earns any income at all. Unemployment—not  low wages—is the real problem. In fact, minimum wage hikes only make it worse. 85%  percent of studies since 1990 have found that increasing the minimum wage  causes companies to cut jobs. By reducing full-time employment opportunities,  minimum wage hikes especially prevent low-skilled workers from gaining  on-the-job experience, making them more likely to stay unemployed. High minimum  wages have  also been linked to the alarming rate of youth  unemployment and underemployment as well. In light of these issues, it is  clear that ensuring a high number of entry-level jobs for low-skilled and  inexperienced workers is far more important than artificially raising wages.

What about the remaining 4%—some 64,000 people—that do depend on the minimum  wage to live? Even for this small group of workers, a higher minimum wage is  both unnecessary and harmful. First, workers that depend on the minimum wage to  live qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), which supplements their  income based on their pay and number of children. For example, a  minimum-wage-earning parent with two children gets $5,236  a year, raising his effective pay from $7.25 to $9.77 an hour. In many  states, the credit is even higher. Second, most people making minimum wage do  not stay at that level for long. For example, a joint-study  by Miami University in Ohio and Florida State University found that over  two-thirds of people earning the minimum wage received raises within a year.  Moreover, minimum wage earners’ raises, on average, are higher than pay  increases for the rest of the labor force. Due to the risk of causing further  unemployment, minimum wage hikes jeopardize the jobs minimum wage earners  already have, depriving them of experience, the chance for promotion, and  qualifying for the EITC.

The idea that many workers depend on the minimum wage rate to survive is  merely an illusion. Unsurprisingly, policies that raise the minimum wage do not  achieve what they set out to do, causing unemployment and hurting the job  prospects of many in the process. If it is still decided that people cannot live  on the minimum wage, a better solution would be to increase the Earned Income  Tax Credit, which would still allow low-skilled and inexperienced workers to  gain valuable job-experience while providing money to those who truly need it.  Either way, the nature of the discussion on minimum wages needs to change if we  want to fairly address the issues of poverty and teen unemployment in the  country.

Like this post? Chip in $5 to AFP.

Join Our Fight

The road to economic freedom starts here.
Join a network of AFP activists in important issue battles across the country, get the inside scoop with breaking news updates and policy alerts, and be the first to hear about special events near your home.  Help us fight for a better tomorrow.  Together, we can work for lower taxes, less government spending, and greater economic freedom for everyone.

Your Information

[contact-form-7 id="544" title="Subscribe"] ×