PR: Analysis Group's Pro-RGGI Cap-and-Trade Study Full of Hot Air
LINK: Study of the Impacts of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Deeply Flawed
BOGOTA, NJ With a vote looming in the New Jersey Legislature on Thursday aimed at forcing New Jersey back into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, aka RGGI, Cap-and-Trade scheme, a report claiming that RGGI has been a boon to participating states has been thoroughly debunked by energy experts.
The study, released late last year by the Analysis Group, contends that the RGGI Cap-and-Trade scheme has turned $1.6 billion in tax revenue collected via sales of carbon allowances into a $1.6 billion in net economic benefits. Liberal politicians and environmentalists, desperate to keep the failing cap-and-trade program alive, along with the multi-billion slush fund it provides, have used the Analysis Groups faulty and misleading report as the basis for convincing lawmakers to re-enter New Jersey into the program.
Today, the Analysis Groups findings were publicly discredited by the Institute for Energy Research (IER), the research arm of the American Energy Alliance (AEA), after a meticulous review of the studys results.
During a press call this afternoon, Dr. Robert Murphy, Senior Fellow and Economist for the Institute for Energy Research, highlighted the major defects of the Analysis Group report.
The Analysis Group study is based on modeling and not fact, said Murphy. The alleged future savings are based on mapping whats happening over time, over the long haul. The results are all completely hypothetical.
The Analysis Group report admits that electricity bills are higher, noted Murphy. This has nothing to do with climate change, per se. There is no claimed environmental benefit in the report.
Murphy added that the Analysis Groups claims of thousands of green jobs created are likewise false and based on a hypothetical simulation and modeling forecast with no basis in reality.
Dan Simmons, AEAs Director of State and Regulatory Affairs, described the Analysis Groups claim of $1.6 billion in economic value added as highly implausible and absurd, while noting that RGGIs targeted emission reduction goals have already been met.
The study contains nothing about what the point of RGGI is, said Simmons. There has been a 30% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions [since RGGI began]. The goal of RGGI has been achieved three times over.
Yet, instead of declaring victory, they want to keep the program in place.
Subsequent to todays call, Americans for Prosperity state director Steve Lonegan issued the following statement:
The Institute for Energy Researchs airtight critique of the phony and flawed Analysis Group study puts to bed once and for all the lie that the RGGI Cap-and-Trade tax, or any tax for that matter, grows jobs and creates wealth and prosperity — and exposes just how far the liberal left and the radical environmentalist movement will go to bamboozle the public and policy makers to advance their extremist agenda.
The RGGI Cap-and-Trade scheme has always been about one thing and one thing only: bilking taxpayers through their electricity bills in order to provide liberal politicians and radical environmentalists a slush fund to subsidize their failed green energy schemes.
Enough is enough. Its time for Trenton lawmakers to start standing up for hard-working New Jersey families rather than saddling them with skyrocketing electricity rates to pay for their pet projects and to enrich the politically well-connected.
The bill to force New Jersey back into RGGI needs to be defeated and legislators ought to get back to work at trying to improve, rather than further damage, New Jerseys economy.
Mr. Lonegan is available for further comment. Please direct all inquiries to our office at 201-487-8844.
Americans for Prosperity does not support or oppose candidates for public office.
Like this post? Chip in $5 to AFP.